The enunciative subjectivity and the constitution of identities in the discourse of feminist magazine La vie en rose.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The question of abortion in Quebec still gives rise to discussions about its legality and women's right to choose. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the editorial of the feminist magazine La Vie en Rose, published in 1982, as a response to the anti-abortion letter written in 1981 by bishops. Based on considerations on enunciation and subjectivity by Kerbrat-Orecchioni, a discursive analyze will be made in order to explain how enunciation contributes in the formation of identities and how subjectivity generates arguments in such discourses. In addition, the notion of "identity"formulated by Stuart Hall and the notion of "power", by Michel Foucault, will be used to explain how discursive constitution of identities in language and in the socio-historical context of discursive production enables the description of relations of power between feminists, the Church, the State and doctors. This analysis will verify the production of multiple identities for women whose goal is to make resistance to the power of hegemonic institutions in Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".