MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Datasets and Code.zip

2021· dataset· en· W4394506354 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Garrett M. Street, Luca Börger, Jonathan R. Potts

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZip codeCode (set theory)Computer scienceProgramming languageDatabaseSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These are the landscape (raster) and relocation (shapefile) data used in "Solving the Sample Size Problem for Resource Selection Functions".<br>These data include 9 of the 10 reported species (caribou, elk, mule deer, muskox, opossum, pig, white-lipped peccary, white-tailed deer, and wolf), and R scripts to perform the complete analysis for white-tailed deer. The scripts may be edited to apply to all datasets.<br>Data for moose are not publicly available at this time due to ownership by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry but may be made available upon request.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3730.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207