Experimental study of bed morphology evolution under two-dimensional dam-break flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study discusses the evolution of bed morphology under 2D dam-break flow by conducting a set of laboratory experiments. The experiments were conducted in a 1.6 m × 28 m × 1.0 m glass flume with non-uniform fly ash as the bed material. Two scenarios were designed: no inflow (scenario 1) and nearly constant water level (scenario 2) in the upstream reservoir. During the experiment, the water levels were measured by pressure sensors which were buried under the sediment layer, and the bed morphology was measured by an ultrasonic ranging system. The results showed that: (1) in scenario 1, the range and depth of the scour pit continued to increase, but the location of the deepest scour point did not change significantly; (2) in scenario 2, the depth and range of scour increased after the dam break, but the growth rate slowed down obviously after t = 15 min. The data can be employed to understand the bed morphology evolution under a dam-break flow, validate numerical approaches, and test geomorphic flood models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".