Utilization of far-red LED to minimize blue light hazard for dynamic semiconductor lighting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The blue light hazard (BLH) and luminous efficacy of a source (ηV) are associated with the photobiological safety and energy saving of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), respectively. In this study, we used genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the BLH, ηV, and color rendering parameters of five-chip hybrid white LEDs. Based on the optimal results, we used five-chip LEDs to obtain the hybrid white light. Their peak wavelengths were 461.5 (blue), 523.9 (green), 588.2 (orange), 643.3 (red), and 694.2 nm (far-red), respectively. In practice, the blue light hazard efficiency of radiation (BLHER) of the hybrid white light was less than 0.10, which was lower than half of the most common light sources. The ηV ranged from 51.6 to 115.6 lm/W at correlated color temperature (CCT) from 2700 to 6500 K. On average, the CIE general color rendering index (Ra), CIE special color rendering index for the ninth deep red test sample (R9), ANSI/IES TM-30 color fidelity index (Rf), and color gamut index (Rg) of hybrid white light were 91.3, 87.8, 83.3, and 96.7, respectively. The melanopic efficacy of luminous radiation (Kmel,V) was tunable in the range of 0.60 to 1.35 mW/lm. These results demonstrated that we used far-red LEDs to fabricate white light with low BLH and relatively high efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".