Timmins (2020) Study 1 data, Human Givens Rewind treatment for posttrauamtic stress in a police force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Rewind treatment for post traumatic stress in a police force setting. Officers and staff in the police force were referred for treatment by the Occupational Health advisors, and all those who were referred were treated with no exclusion criteria. Any staff with a possible diagnosis for PTSD were first seen by the Forces Medical Advisor for a diagnosis before making a referral for Rewind treatment. All the clients treated using Rewind in a specific police force between 2009 and 2013 were included and gave informed consent to participate in this study prior to starting treatment. All those treated by the service completed the CORE-OM before and after treatment. Those with a diagnosis of PTSD or PTS were also given the IES-R before and after treatment. The Griffin and Tyrrell (2004) HG treatment was used with the Griffin and Tyrrell (2001) protocol for the Rewind technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".