Long-term performance of textured HDPE geomembranes in municipal solid waste landfills
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of blown-film co-extrusion texturing (using entrained nitrogen gas) on the long-term performance of high-density polyethylene geomembranes (GMBs) immersed in synthetic municipal solid waste leachate is examined over an approximately 8-year period. Antioxidant depletion of the textured part is shown to be much faster than that of the smooth edge. Likewise, the degradation in the tensile break properties at 85 °C is faster for the textured part than for the smooth-edge portion and smooth equivalent. The updated estimates for antioxidant depletion time based on data at four different temperatures (40, 55, 75, and 85 °C) over 98 months of data collection are compared with predictions based on 34 months of data, and the implications are discussed. Nominal failure was reached at 75 °C, and this combined with data at 85 °C allows prediction of the time between depletion of standard oxidative induction time and nominal failure at lower temperatures. The effect of salt concentration in incubation fluid on the time to degradation is examined. Finally, the paper comments on the uses of textured versus smooth GMB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".