MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394571384 · doi:10.4039/tce.2024.6

First detection of the woolly alder sawfly, <i>Eriocampa ovata</i> (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), in Manitoba, Canada, on novel host <i>Alnus hirsuta</i> ‘Harbin’ (Betulaceae)

2024· article· en· W4394571384 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexander J.F. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTenthredinidaeSawflyAlderHymenopteraBetulaceaeAlnus glutinosaBiologyHost (biology)BotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eriocampa ovata (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), commonly known as woolly alder sawfly, is an introduced species to North America. Its larvae have six or more prolegs, a brown spot on the head’s vertex, and are woolly in appearance due to a wax secretion from epidermal glands. The author was contacted about six recently planted alder trees in Winnipeg and Victoria Beach, Manitoba, Canada. The trees were determined to be Alnus hirsuta ‘Harbin’ (Betulaceae) (Prairie HorizonTM Manchurian alder), a tree species that has recently gained popularity in Manitoban urban forestry. The defoliation was determined to be caused by larvae of E. ovata. This is the first published record of E. ovata in Manitoba and the first published record of E. ovata on A. hirsuta. This detection should inform pest inventories for E. ovata in Manitoba and provide the basis for a critical examination of biosecurity measures for A. hirsuta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207