MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394571638 · doi:10.1061/ppscfx.sceng-1425

Universal Structural Design Criteria for Heavy Industrial Projects

2024· article· en· W4394571638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstruction engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringBusinessForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides universal structural design criteria for heavy industrial projects. Structural design requirements for pipe racks, steel modules, modularized equipment skids, vertical and horizontal vessel supports, and vibrating equipment foundations are discussed. An overview of loading mechanisms of various systems is provided for operational, testing, and lifting conditions. Design recommendations are provided for permanent and removable structures. Several structural idealization concepts are also proposed to ensure accurate load transfer. The theoretical basis and the merits of various methods used in the practice are also discussed. Industrial design examples are provided including multilevel pipe rack and pump foundations. The paper overviews and pieces together the engineering requirements for critical structures that are encountered in heavy industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it