MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394576816 · doi:10.24875/recic.m23000440

Las curvas de presi�n-volumen y otras m�tricas de funci�n cardiaca pueden esclarecer la respuesta fallida al TAVI y otras intervenciones

2024· editorial· es· W4394576816 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Keshavarz‐Motamed

Bibliographic record

VenueREC, Interventional cardiology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most acute and chronic cardiovascular disease conditions.Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart abnormality and affected individuals have a 50% chance of developing severe aortic valve stenosis during their lifetime.In aortic valve disease (both aortic valve stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve), the heart valves are damaged and do not work properly.This condition can rapidly affect the pumping action of the heart and can progress to heart failure.Heart failure is a deadly disease affecting at least 26 million people worldwide and its prevalence is increasing with high mortality and morbidity.1 Most importantly, aortic valve disease commonly coexists with other cardiovascular diseases, giving rise to the most general yet fundamentally challenging scenario: complex valvular, ventricular, and vascular diseases (C3VD).In C3VD, multiple valvular, ventricular, and vascular pathologies interact with one another, while the physical phenomena associated with each pathology amplify the effects of others on the cardiovascular system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREC, Interventional cardiologySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207