MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394577834 · doi:10.11647/obp.0373.26

Metal and Water

2024· book-chapter· en· W4394577834 on OpenAlexaff
Nadja C. Kunz

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Book Publishers · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regardless of where mines are located, they require and interact with large quantities of water. The nature of these interactions depends on a variety of factors including the location and geological characteristics of the mineral deposit, the commodity being mined and the processing method. Beyond the technical improvements needed to improve water use and management, mining companies must also build stronger relationships and open communication with potentially impacted communities and rights-holders. This chapter explores the need for new collaborative approaches to advance water management and stewardship across a mine’s life cycle, highlighting key scientific, engineering and social challenges that must be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Book PublishersSame topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207