MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394586640 · doi:10.62507/a21.v1i1.13

MARSHALL MCLUHAN’ LESSONS FOR DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE PRACTITIONERS

2013· article· pt· W4394586640 on OpenAlexaff
Robert K. Logan

Bibliographic record

VenueArte 21 · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArchitecturePhilosophySociologyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os insights que Marshall McLuhan desenvolveu que poderiam ser úteis para as comunidades da arquitetura e design estão reunidos nessa apresentação. Esses abrangem a sua noção de espaço visual e acústico, os meios quentes e frios, a Global Village, inversão da causa e efeito, o papel do artista na sociedade e a cultura do faça-o-você-mesmo [DIY Do it yourself ]. Aqui discutimos como a multi-sensorialidade do espaço acústico conduz ao design e arquitetura multi-sensorial. Exploramos o entendimento de McLuhan sobre o papel que o artista desempenha na sociedade em fazer sugestões concretas paro engajamento de designers e arquitetos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArte 21Same topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207