Optimizing FPGA implementation of high-precision chaotic systems for improved performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing chaotic systems-on-a-chip is gaining much attention due to its great potential in securing communication, encrypting data, generating random numbers, and more. The digital implementation of chaotic systems strives to achieve high performance in terms of time, speed, complexity, and precision. In this paper, the focus is on developing high-speed Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) cores for chaotic systems, exemplified by the Lorenz system. The developed cores correspond to numerical integration techniques that can extend to the equations of the sixth order and at high precision. The investigation comprises a thorough analysis and evaluation of the developed cores according to the algorithm complexity and the achieved precision, hardware area, throughput, power consumption, and maximum operational frequency. Validations are done through simulations and careful comparisons with outstanding closely related work from the recent literature. The results affirm the successful creation of highly efficient sixth-order Lorenz discretizations, achieving a high throughput of 3.39 Gbps with a precision of 16 bits. Additionally, an outstanding throughput of 21.17 Gbps was achieved for the first-order implementation coupled with a high precision of 64 bits. These outcomes set our work as a benchmark for high-performance characteristics, surpassing similar investigations reported in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".