MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394607213 · doi:10.1163/15685411-bja10322

Ektaphelenchoides factum n. sp. in Pinus taeda from the USA and E. pini in Pinus koraiensis from China

2024· article· en· W4394607213 on OpenAlexaff
Jianfeng Gu, Munawar Maria, Xinxin Ma, Yiwu Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueNematology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRostrumGenusPinus <genus>BotanyAnatomyPopulationZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The genus Ektaphelenchoides is a diverse group of nematodes; they are either inhabitants of trees or present in the rhizosphere of economical plants. Members of the genus have ecological relevance in terms of being associated with insects and predators of other nematodes. In the present study, a new Ektaphelenchoides species, E. factum n. sp., is described and illustrated. The new species was isolated from a log sample of Pinus taeda imported from the USA. It is characterised by the lateral field with three incisures, stylet distinctly tripartite. Females having a vulval flap, the anus and rectum indistinct, and the tail (posterior part of body) filiform. Males having arcuate and 21.5 (19.4-22.9) μm long spicules, the lamina of the spicule is smoothly curved to distal end, condylus well developed with a broadly rounded tip, rostrum triangular with finely rounded tip and cucullus absent, tail arcuate and conical with terminus bearing a sharply pointed mucron. The new species is different from other Ektaphelenchoides species in having a vulval flap. Molecular characterisation and phylogenetic studies also supported its unique status. In addition, a Chinese native population of E. pini, detected in Pinus koraiensis branches from Liaoning province, P.R. China, is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNematologySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207