A Linear Quadratic Integral Approach to the Profiling of Engine Speed for Synchronization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">During driving conditions, when it is needed to transition from Electric Vehicle (EV) to Hybrid Vehicle operation, synchronization of the engine with the shaft and transmission is essential to enable clutch engagement and, subsequently, providing engine power to the wheels. Challenges arise when the engine must generate power to move itself and cannot rely on electric motors for precision. Cost-effective hybrid vehicle propulsion architectures which utilize small 12V belt-starter generators (BSGs) to initiate engine activation are inherently affected. In these situations, a speed profile that balance rapid response and control effort while considering system limitations to mitigate undesirable overshoots and delays, is required. This paper presents a Linear Quadratic Integral (LQI) approach to formulate a speed reference profile that ensures optimal engine behavior. The proposed strategy is seamlessly integrated as an open-loop feedforward controller into a powertrain torque control supervisor. System constraints are evaluated downstream the LQI where the electric authority is considered, and the target is achieved by jointly actuate electric machine and the engine. A low-level engine control is tasked to command the actuators to meet such profile. Through the utilization of case studies, including scenarios involving engine activation during EV mode, the paper highlights the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".