Machine learning techniques based on 18F-FDG PET radiomics features of temporal regions for the classification of temporal lobe epilepsy patients from healthy controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the clinical application of 18 F-FDG PET radiomics features for temporal lobe epilepsy and to create PET radiomics-based machine learning models for differentiating temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients from healthy controls. Methods A total of 347 subjects who underwent 18 F-FDG PET scans from March 2014 to January 2020 (234 TLE patients: 25.50 ± 8.89 years, 141 male patients and 93 female patients; and 113 controls: 27.59 ± 6.94 years, 48 male individuals and 65 female individuals) were allocated to the training ( n = 248) and test ( n = 99) sets. All 3D PET images were registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute template. PyRadiomics was used to extract radiomics features from the temporal regions segmented according to the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Boruta algorithms were applied to select the radiomics features significantly associated with TLE. Eleven machine-learning algorithms were used to establish models and to select the best model in the training set. Results The final radiomics features ( n = 7) used for model training were selected through the combinations of the LASSO and the Boruta algorithms with cross-validation. All data were randomly divided into a training set ( n = 248) and a testing set ( n = 99). Among 11 machine-learning algorithms, the logistic regression (AUC 0.984, F1-Score 0.959) model performed the best in the training set. Then, we deployed the corresponding online website version ( https://wane199.shinyapps.io/TLE_Classification/ ), showing the details of the LR model for convenience. The AUCs of the tuned logistic regression model in the training and test sets were 0.981 and 0.957, respectively. Furthermore, the calibration curves demonstrated satisfactory alignment (visually assessed) for identifying the TLE patients. Conclusion The radiomics model from temporal regions can be a potential method for distinguishing TLE. Machine learning-based diagnosis of TLE from preoperative FDG PET images could serve as a useful preoperative diagnostic tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".