MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394620941 · doi:10.33612/diss.958184956

Classical, quantum and numerical aspects of modified theories of gravity

2024· dissertation· en· W4394620941 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrich K. Beckering Vinckers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersNational Research FoundationUniversity of Cape TownUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad de SalamancaRijksuniversiteit GroningenErasmus+Universitetet i Oslo
KeywordsQuantum gravityTheoretical physicsQuantumSemiclassical gravityClassical mechanicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum dynamicsQuantum process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we examine some specific aspects of two classes of modified gravity theories: ghostfree infinite-derivative gravity and so-called f (R) gravity.Regarding the former, we consider the four-dimensional theory at the level of the quadratic action and study the single graviton exchange of two massive spin-0 particles.We derive the corresponding gravitational potential energy for the non-static case and show that the quantum correction of the local theory, which is in the form of a Dirac delta function, is smeared out in the non-local theory.It is also shown that the gravitational potential energy associated with the self-interaction of the individual particles is finite.We then examine the quantum gravitational entanglement of two test masses that undergo a spatial splitting that is orthogonal to their separation.For such a set-up, we compute the concurrence and von Neumann entropy for the entanglement and show that an increase in the length scale of nonlocality leads to a decrease in both of the aforementioned quantities.Our attention is then turned to two specific two-dimensional dilaton gravity models; namely the Spherically-Reduced Gravity (SRG) and the Callan-Giddings-Harvey-Strominger (CGHS) theories.The quadratic action for each theory is derived and diagonalised in order to construct ghost-free infinite-derivative modifications.In the case of the SRG theory, we make use of the Schwarzschild-type gauge whereas, for the CGHS theory, we impose the conformal gauge.For each of the two local theories, we construct appropriate source actions that can be used to generate their respective linearised black-hole solutions.We then make use of the same source actions in the linearised non-local theories and obtain non-local modifications to the aforesaid solutions.Lastly, we consider the application of numerical relativity techniques to f (R) gravity models.It is well-known that the Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura (BSSN) modification of the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner formulation of General Relativity is suitable for the construction of numerical relativity codes.While a BSSN-like formulation for f (R) gravity exists, it is constructed with Cartesian coordinates in mind.In this thesis, we generalise the formalism to accommodate arbitrary coordinates and then impose spherical symmetry.The description of a numerical relativity code for the Starobinsky gravity model based on this formalism is given before considering a number of scenarios.We first perform the evolution of Schwarzschild Einstein-Rosen bridge initial data using the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method as well as the evolution of a gauge pulse in flat space using the Partially-Implicit-Runge-Kutta scheme.These two cases serve as tests for our code and our results are compared with those presented in the literature.Then, we perform the evolution of a massless scalar field in the context of the Starobinsky gravity model and show that damped oscillations arise for subcritical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→