MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394623648 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v16n5p48

On the Economic Sustainable Development Approaches and Prospects of Cultural Heritage—”Cultural Heritage Mogao Grottoes for Economic Development of Dunhuang through Cultural Tourism Cooperation” as an Example

2024· article· en· W4394623648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural heritageTourismSustainable developmentPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the times, China’s cultural heritage continues to innovate and develop in the process of protection and inheritance; at the same time, the inherited value of cultural heritage itself and the tourism benefits it brings have an indelible impact on economic development. How to achieve sustainable development of cultural heritage is one of the important issues facing cultural heritage. This paper takes Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes cultural tourism cooperation for economic development as an example, studies the current situation of cultural tourism cooperation of cultural heritage and the cultural tourism cooperation policy programme implemented by Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes, and describes the sustainable development of cultural heritage and its economic development and prospects in the light of the digital development of cultural heritage in the process of cultural tourism cooperation at present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it