Slice and Conquer: A Planar-to-3D Framework for Efficient Interactive Segmentation of Volumetric Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactive segmentation methods have been investigated to address the potential need for additional refinement in automatic segmentation via human-in-the-loop techniques. For accurate segmentation of 3D images, we propose Slice-and-Conquer, a novel planar-to-3D pipeline formulating volumetric mask construction into two stages: 1) 2D interactive segmentation and 2) guided 3D segmentation. Specifically, the first stage enables users to focus on a single 2D slice and provides the corresponding 2D prediction results as strong shape priors. Taking the planar guidance, an accurate 3D mask can be constructed with minimal interactions. To support a flexible iterative refinement, our system recommends a next slice to annotate at the end of the second stage. Since volumetric segmentation can be completed by consecutively annotating a few recommended 2D slices, our method significantly reduces the cognitive burden of exploring volumetric space for users. Through extensive experiments on various datasets of 3D biomedical images, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".