MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394630994 · doi:10.17118/11143/20539

La educación para la concientización planetaria

2023· article· es· W4394630994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie des savoirs des Suds · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and sustainability education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen : Entendemos por Educación para la concientización planetaria al conjunto de los procesos sociales,
\neconómicos, culturales, políticos, cognitivos, etc., con los cuales aprendemos a considerarnos como seres que
\ncomparten un destino común, el de ser terrestres vulnerables, cualquiera sea el color de nuestra piel, nuestros
\norígenes sociales, nuestra lengua, cultura, nuestras cosmovisiones, creencias religiosas, nuestra historia e
\nidentidad nacional. Esta educación que comienza desde el nacimiento hasta la muerte, debe permitirnos sentirnos
\nestar vinculados no solo con los seres humanos, sino también con los no humanos (animales, plantas,
\nmontañas, ríos, fuentes mineras, y con lo demás) que pueblan el planeta. Uno de esos objetivos es ayudarnos
\na respetar a nuestros semejantes, a los no humanos, así como a las divinidades locales que existen en ellas
\n(las localidades). ¿Qué significa la Educación para la conscientización planetaria ? ¿Cuáles son los valores de
\nesta educación ? ¿Cómo ésta podría suplantar a la educación para el lucro ? Intentaremos responder a estas
\npreguntas basándonos en diferentes investigaciones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.023
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it