Bibliographic record
Abstract
By the early 1840s, years before the first rail lines were pushed west of Chicago, the aggressively successful business practices of John Frink and Martin O. Walker had already made Chicago the center of a web of stagecoach routes connecting the southwest tip of Lake Michigan with virtually every important economic region in the fast developing area of the old Northwest Territory. Both New Englanders, Frink and Walker seem to have been the classic Illinois frontier odd couple. Frink was described by virtually everyone who knew him as a boisterous, hard-driving man, while Walker was considered by many to be a rather cold fish, at least by the standards of the Illinois frontier. Besides their opposite personalities, the pair were also separated by politics. Frink was a staunch Whig, while Walker was active in Democratic politics.1 The two began their business relationship in 1839, then went on to formally establish Frink, Walker & Company in 1840. They continued their apparently uneasy, although financially successful, partnership until 1856, when the two finally split, both personally and professionally. During the nearly two decades of their association, the company the pair built came to dominate virtually all the stagecoach business in Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Indiana, and Missouri.2 Frink was born at Ashford, Connecticut on October 17, 1797 into a family closely tied to the stagecoach industry. His father, also named John Frink, operated stagecoach inns in Connecticut and Massachusetts and also had interests in stage lines in those states. Frink reportedly had life as a stage driver before becoming a successful stagecoach operator himself, establishing lines between Boston, Massachusetts and Albany, New York as well as a line linking New York City with Montreal, Canada.3 Years after his death, a friend described Frink as, A man of limited education and without cultivation, yet he was a man of strong mind, wonderful natural intelligence, indomitable will, great sagacity and a remarkable knowledge of human nature.4 Despite the respect and real affection with which he was often regarded by his friends, Frink also had a dark and ruthless side, one that would eventually result in the dissolution of his successful partnerships and estrangement from his family.5 Although he was reportedly a skillful stage operator in the East, Frink was, like most skilled and capable entrepreneurs, always open to new opportunities. The stage business was not for the faint of heart at the best of times, given its cutthroat competition and the politics involved with securing the all-important mail contracts. In addition, railroads had begun to make gradual inroads into the areas Frink's lines served, and starting as early as 1831 had begun to carry the U.S. Mail, though in admittedly extremely limited areas. At least partly due to those reasons, he traveled west about 1830 to gauge economic opportunities, and returned home impressed by the growing region's potential.6 For these reasons at least, and probably others, Frink, his first wife, Martha R. Marcy Frink, and their three children emigrated to the western boom town that was Chicago in 1836.7 When Frink arrived at Chicago, he found Dr. John Taylor Temple, a young physician, in possession of not only the area's largest and oldest stage line, but also the all-important mail contracts that went with it.8 Temple established the first stagecoach link between Chicago and the head of navigation on the Illinois River at Ottawa in 1834.9 Two years later, he established a new stage route to the booming lead mining area at Galena. Upon his arrival, Frink lost no time in establishing a competing line. Shortly thereafter, he managed to persuade John S. Trowbridge, who had established a stage line in 1835 to compete with Temple, to join him. This began a series of short-lived partnerships with a varied collection of individuals, each headed by Frink. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".