MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394682297 · doi:10.1002/cphc.202300802

Transient Study of Photoluminescence in Nanowaveguides Doped with Quantum Emitters and Metallic Nanoparticles

2024· article· en· W4394682297 on OpenAlexafffund
Grant Brassem, Mahi R. Singh, S. G. Yastrebov

Bibliographic record

VenueChemPhysChem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyFulbright CanadaVanderbilt University
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceDopingTransient (computer programming)NanoparticleMetalMaterials scienceQuantum dotOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyQuantumPhotochemistryChemical physicsChemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMetallurgyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the time-dependent optical properties of nanowaveguides containing an ensemble of noninteracting quantum emitters and interaction metallic nanoparticles. We have developed a theory for transient photoluminescence (PL) and exciton population density using the density matrix method. In our theory, we have included the effect of the dipole-dipole interaction (DDI) between metallic nanoparticles along with the effect of the surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) created by metallic nanoparticles. We compared our theory with the transient PL experiments of nanohybrids fabricated from CdSe/ZnS quantum dots and an Ag nanorod array. A good agreement between theory and PL experiment is found. We have also examined the transient behavior of the photoluminescence in the presence of the DDI and SPP couplings. It is observed that the number of transient PL oscillations increases as the DDI coupling increases. The width of the transient peaks also increases as the amount of the DDI coupling increases. Finally, we predicted that the peaks of the transient PL oscillation split from one peak to two peaks as the intensity of the DDI coupling reaches the strong coupling limit. The strong coupling limit is defined when the DDI coupling is larger than the PL decay rates. This finding can be used to fabricate nano switches by using one peak as the OFF position and two peaks as the ON position. The above findings also suggest the transient plasmonic properties of nanowaveguides can be controlled by the SPP and DDI couplings. These findings have potential applications in the development of transient nanoscale plasmonic devices such as nano detectors and optical nano switches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemPhysChemSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207