Pierre Laval and Nazi Ideology: Complacency and Indifference from 1933 until his Death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the Great War, Pierre Laval, who had come from the extreme left, rejected ideologies in favour of a single objective that dominated all politics: peace. However, believing he was abstracting himself from ideologies, he failed to see that his pacifism, hostile to anti-fascist struggles, played into the hands of the Nazi warmongers while he was Minister of Foreign Affairs. More surprisingly, as the architect of the collaboration during the war, which he saw as a policy capable of obtaining more from Germany than the armistice agreement, he thought he could keep France out of the global conflict but also maintain a sovereign policy, independent of the Nazi programme, while anticipating its expectations, particularly in terms of antisemitic persecution. Laval embodied the singular case in Nazi Europe of a head of government of a State that remained sovereign and chose to apply part of the Nazi programme, particularly in terms of Nazi persecution, without adhering to its ideology. The pacifist did not identify with racism, nationalism, historical Darwinism, or anything to do with the regeneration of man through war.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".