MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394692764 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202401392

Facilitating Highly Reversible Li‐Ion Storage of MoSe<sub>2</sub>‐TiO<sub>2</sub>‐MXene via Double Heterostructures

2024· article· en· W4394692764 on OpenAlexaff
Cai Liu, Peng Zhao, Keren Lu, Shuai Han, Chao Zhang, Xifeng Xia, Wu Lei, Qiubo Guo, Qingli Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceHeterojunctionEnergy storageAnodePhase (matter)IonPower densityNanotechnologyElectrodeConductivityCapacitorChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsPower (physics)VoltageElectrical engineeringPhysical chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heterostructured composites, inheriting the integrated properties of the individual components due to the synergistic effect, have engendered great attention in materials science and energy storage. However, conventional biphasic heterostructures not only optimize the performance of the composites but also aggregate the inevitable drawbacks, which can be addressed with the construction of the triphasic heterostructures by introducing an appropriate intermediate phase, significantly. Herein, a two‐dimensional (2D) double‐heterostructures MoSe 2 ‐TiO 2 ‐MXene anode is architected for Li‐ion storage, which combines the advantages of the high theoretical capacity of MoSe 2 and metallic conductivity of MXene. Besides, the in‐situ derived TiO 2 can alleviate the irreversible phase transition of MoSe 2 , arising from the low electronic/ionic conductivities, through electronic coupling effects. Meanwhile, the intermediate phase of TiO 2 can further prevent the restacking issue of MXene, thus sustaining its high conductivity. Finally, the three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology is employed to further improve the kinetics of the electrodes for Li‐ion capacitors (LICs), which deliver the power density of 5563 W kg −1 at an energy density of 51 Wh kg −1 , and a remarkable cycling stability for 20 000 cycles at 1 A g −1 . This work deepens the understanding of the influence of heterostructured engineering on the design of high‐energy/power storage devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsFrench-language works237,207