Evaluation of serum levels of all the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β 1-3) isoforms in asthmatic patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic inflammatory disease of the airways.Chronic inflammation leads to changes in the structure and stiffening of the bronchial wall, and irreversible disruption of airflow through the airways.One of the factors researchers consider important in the process of inflammation and fibrosis is the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β).Overexpression of TGF-β in the structural cells of the bronchial tree is thought to translate into excessive secretion of type I and III collagen, fibronectin, tenascin and proteoglycans, as well as inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases and collagenases, promoting the phenomenon of remodeling.Aim: To evaluate serum levels of all the TGF-β (TGF-β 1-3) isoforms in asthmatic patients, compare the obtained results with those of non-asthmatic subjects, and analyze potential correlations between particular isoforms. Material and methods:The study included 69 individuals, 41 asthmatic patients and 28 non-asthmatic volunteers recruited from the Department of Allergology and the Allergy and Pulmonology Outpatient Clinic of N. Barlicki University Teaching Hospital No. 1 in Lodz.The participants underwent a full medical examination and spirometry, and blood samples were collected from them for serum TGF-β levels.Individual isoforms, i.e., TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3, were determined by ELISA.The data obtained were then subjected to statistical analysis using Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's t-test and Pearson's correlation method.Results: The obtained results show a significant increase in TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 levels, as well as a slight increase in TGF-β3 concentration among asthmatic patients compared to the general population.Additionally, there occurred a significant association between TGF-β1 and TGF-β2.TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 isoforms were found to be associated with the pathogenesis of asthma.Among the patients, serum TGF-β levels were significantly higher compared to the control group.Conclusions: The TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 isoforms appear to have a cumulative effect on remodeling processes in the airways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".