The politics of proclamation, the politics of commemoration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the politics of proclamation, the politics of commemoration O ctober 7, 2013 marks the 250th year since King George III issued what is, for Canadians, the Crown's most famous Royal Proclamation.Over the 17th and 18th centuries, the English monarch released over a hundred royal proclamations.Some of these procla mations declared war (usually against France), others-such as the Royal Proc lamation of October 23, 1759-mandated public thanksgiving and celebration, while others focused on more local laws (lotteries in Virginia in 1621, pro hibiting trade in Hudson's Bay in 1688, establishing a post office in 1711, and mandating "fast days" in England dur ing the American Revolution).Few of these proclamations, however, carry the historical legacy of the one issued in October 1763. an oUtlinE of thE 1763 RoYal PRoClamationKnown by some as First Nations peo ple's or Canada's Magna Carta, the 1763 Royal Proclamation laid a framework for British behaviour and law in North America following France's defeat in the Seven Years' War.The Proclamation performed three functions.First, it estab lished the boundaries and governance structures for four newly acquired col onies: Quebec, East and West Florida, and Grenada.It also annexed le Saint Jean (Prince Edward Island) and Cape
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it