MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394702948 · doi:10.25071/ddnwqb22

Editorial: The politics of evidence

2015· editorial· en· W4394702948 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jody Berland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Watch · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityCanadian Centre for Policy AlternativesYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

outcome of collaboration between the Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies and the Politics of Evidence (POE) Working Group, an inter-university collaboration convened by Professor Natasha Myers.This working group brings together over 40 faculty and graduate student members from

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.080
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.080
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0210.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.291
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada WatchSame topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207