MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394711549 · doi:10.1109/mts.2024.3372610

OpenWasteAI—Open Data, IoT, and AI for Circular Economy and Waste Tracking in Resource-Constrained Communities

2024· article· en· W4394711549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Technology and Society Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular economyInternet of ThingsResource (disambiguation)Tracking (education)Computer scienceBusinessEnvironmental economicsWaste managementEngineeringWorld Wide WebEconomicsComputer networkEcologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Article, we will introduce several interrelated problems present in municipal solid waste recycling efforts, both globally and locally. The introduction serves to demonstrate how the lack of adequate global waste tracking and community-level waste contamination are related issues. This article elaborates on how these issues could be addressed with the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and open data technology deployment. We will investigate the existing and possible applicability of this solution in resource-constrained environments, as opposed to exclusive use in the typical “smart city” context. Finally, we will discuss the risks and limitations of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it