The Characteristics of Cloud Computing in the Internet of Things and the Application of Key Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the characteristics and key technologies of cloud computing in the Internet of Things (IoT) application. IoT, as an emerging technology, is rapidly evolving and profoundly impacting human life and work. Cloud computing, as one of the fundamental technologies supporting IoT development, provides robust computing and storage support. Firstly, we analyze the characteristics of cloud computing in IoT, including its highly flexible resource scheduling capability, scalability, reliability, and challenges such as security and privacy protection. Next, we introduce key technologies in IoT and cloud computing, including data collection and transmission, storage and computation, edge computing, and virtualization technology. In terms of key technology applications, we delve into encryption algorithms for data security and privacy protection, machine learning and data mining algorithms for big data analysis and mining, and task allocation and scheduling algorithms for edge computing and collaborative processing. Through case studies, we demonstrate the practical application of these key technologies in areas such as smart homes, smart cities, and industrial IoT, and provide insights into the future development trends of cloud computing in IoT, emphasizing the importance of security, intelligence, and sustainable development, to further promote the development of IoT technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".