MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Parametric optimization of a drone mounted sprayer to maximize the swath width using Taguchi design

2024· article· en· W4394717230 on OpenAlexaff
T M Kavya, Sushilendra Sushilendra, Sunil Shirwal, Vijayakumar Palled, A. G. Sreenivas, N Ananda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research in Agronomy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMaRS
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaguchi methodsSprayerDroneParametric statisticsComputer scienceParametric designOptimal designEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringStatisticsBiologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drones have revolutionized modern agriculture by offering precision and efficiency in pesticide spraying. This study evaluates the performance of a hexacopter drone for pesticide application and aims to determine the optimal combination of operational parameters to maximize swath width. The independent parameters include type of nozzle (flat fan nozzle, hollow cone nozzle and spinning disc nozzle), forward speed (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 m s-1) and height of spray (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 m) while swath width is the performance evaluation criterion. The experiments were conducted using Taguchi L-25 orthogonal experimental design, the study identifies a combination of a forward speed of 6 m/s, a height of spray at 3 m, and a spinning disc nozzle as optimal, resulting in a swath width of 7.19 m. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate operational parameters for effective pesticide application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research in AgronomySame topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207