DimReg: Embedding Dimension Search via Regularization for Recommender Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern recommender systems aim to identify items that are most pertinent to a particular user and are particularly useful when an overwhelming number of items are present. Feature embedding is essential to deep recommender systems, which constructs memory-efficient and semantically meaningful representations by mapping high-dimensional sparse feature vectors into low-dimensional dense vectors. Most existing systems assign a unified dimension to all feature fields, regardless of the diverse importance of different features, which usually results in sub-optimal performance and high memory usage. In this paper, we propose a low-cost embedding dimension search approach named DimReg for recommender systems, by assessing information overlapping between the dimensions within each feature field and pruning unimportant and redundant dimensions progressively during model training via a two-level polarization regularizer, while introducing minimum overhead. Moreover, our method does not require retraining after embedding dimension search, which significantly reduces the computational cost and is more friendly to deployment in real-world recommender systems. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple CTR (Click Through Rate) prediction tasks demonstrate that our method can efficiently reduce the model parameters up to 98.6%, and achieve strong recommendation performance outperforming existing automated embedding dimension search methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".