Knowledge Guided Machine Learning for Extracting, Preserving, and Adapting Physics-aware Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Training machine learning (ML) models for scientific problems is often challenging due to limited observation data. To overcome this challenge, prior works commonly pre-train ML models using simulated data before having them fine-tuned with small real data. Despite the promise shown in initial research across different domains, these methods cannot ensure improved performance after fine-tuning because (i) they are not designed for extracting generalizable physics-aware features during pre-training, (ii) the features learned from pre-training can be distorted by the fine-tuning process. In this paper, we propose a new learning method for extracting, preserving, and adapting physics-aware features. We build a knowledge-guided neural network (KGNN) model based on known dependencies amongst physical variables, which facilitate extracting physics-aware feature representation from simulated data. Then we fine-tune this model by alternately updating the encoder and decoder of the KGNN model to enhance the prediction while preserving the physics-aware features learned through pre-training. We further propose to adapt the model to new testing scenarios via a teacher-student learning framework based on the model uncertainty. The results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms many baselines by a good margin, even using sparse training data or under out-of-sample testing scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".