Predicting Language Function Post-Stroke: A Model-Based Structural Connectivity Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prediction of post-stroke language function is essential for the development of individualized treatment plans based on the personal recovery potential of aphasic stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: To establish a framework for integrating information on connectivity disruption of the language network based on routinely collected clinical magnetic resonance (MR) images into Random Forest modeling to predict post-stroke language function. METHODS: trial, using the Token Test (TT), Boston Naming Test (BNT), and Semantic Verbal Fluency (sVF) Test as primary outcome measures. Individual infarct masks were superimposed onto a diffusion tensor imaging tractogram reference set to calculate Change in Connectivity scores of language-relevant gray matter regions as estimates of structural connectivity disruption. Multivariable Random Forest models were derived to predict language function. RESULTS: Random Forest models explained moderate to high amount of variance at baseline and follow-up for the TT (62.7% and 76.2%), BNT (47.0% and 84.3%), and sVF (52.2% and 61.1%). Initial language function and non-verbal cognitive ability were the most important variables to predict language function. Connectivity disruption explained additional variance, resulting in a prediction error increase of up to 12.8% with variable omission. Left middle temporal gyrus (12.8%) and supramarginal gyrus (9.8%) were identified as among the most important network nodes. CONCLUSION: Connectivity disruption of the language network adds predictive value beyond lesion volume, initial language function, and non-verbal cognitive ability. Obtaining information on connectivity disruption based on routine clinical MR images constitutes a significant advancement toward practical clinical application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".