MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394724014

NECTURUS MACULOSUS (Common Mudpuppy). NESTING BEHAVIOR

2024· article· W4394724014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNecturusNesting (process)ZoologyBiologyMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common Mudpuppies (Necturus maculosus maculosus) are the most widespread and wellstudied of the Proteidae, ranging from northern Georgia into eastern Canada and west to the Great Plains. Despite this extensive range, most of our knowledge of life history traits for mudpuppies is based on studies occurring in the northern half of its range, specifically the Great Lakes region. Little is known regarding life history traits in the southern portion of its range. In Tennessee, N. maculosus is thought to occur statewide in permanent streams, rivers, and likely in reservoirs and lakes. Literature suggests that parturition and nest-guarding in N. maculosus maculosus occurs in late winter through spring, but there are no published observations to verify this in Tennessee (Pasachnik and Niemiller 2011. In Niemiller and Reynolds [eds.], The Amphibians of Tennessee, pp. 231-233. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee). Here, we report four observations of N. maculosus maculosus nests that were discovered while conducting snorkel surveys and lifting cover objects opportunistically for aquatic salamanders from 2011 to 2017, and approximate timing of laying in three river tributaries to the Tennessee River.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207