MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394724339 · doi:10.2514/1.g005915

Hybrid Nonlinear Passivity-Based Control Approach to Magnetic-Impulsive Spacecraft Attitude Regulation

2024· article· en· W4394724339 on OpenAlexaff
Esmaeil Sharifi, Christopher J. Damaren

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityControl theory (sociology)SpacecraftNonlinear systemRobustness (evolution)Attitude controlComputer scienceControl engineeringHybrid systemNonlinear controlControl (management)EngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes two novel passivity-based control design frameworks for hybrid nonlinear time-varying dynamical systems involving an interacting amalgam of continuous-time and discrete-time dynamics whose dynamical properties evolve periodically over time. In this regard, the hybrid Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov conditions are employed in tandem with the passivity theorem to construct a three-step control design algorithm to render closed-loop dynamics stable. The proposed control architectures are subsequently exploited to regulate the attitude motion of spacecraft with magnetic and impulsive modes of operation. Practical considerations involved in implementing the proposed hybrid algorithms are then discussed in detail. Simulation results show significant improvement in the performance of the attitude control system in terms of system response, robustness, and the required magnetic and impulsive control usage as compared to a hybrid linear approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207