MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394724339 · doi:10.2514/1.g005915

Hybrid Nonlinear Passivity-Based Control Approach to Magnetic-Impulsive Spacecraft Attitude Regulation

2024· article· en· W4394724339 on OpenAlex
Esmaeil Sharifi, Christopher J. Damaren

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityControl theory (sociology)SpacecraftNonlinear systemRobustness (evolution)Attitude controlComputer scienceControl engineeringHybrid systemNonlinear controlControl (management)EngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes two novel passivity-based control design frameworks for hybrid nonlinear time-varying dynamical systems involving an interacting amalgam of continuous-time and discrete-time dynamics whose dynamical properties evolve periodically over time. In this regard, the hybrid Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov conditions are employed in tandem with the passivity theorem to construct a three-step control design algorithm to render closed-loop dynamics stable. The proposed control architectures are subsequently exploited to regulate the attitude motion of spacecraft with magnetic and impulsive modes of operation. Practical considerations involved in implementing the proposed hybrid algorithms are then discussed in detail. Simulation results show significant improvement in the performance of the attitude control system in terms of system response, robustness, and the required magnetic and impulsive control usage as compared to a hybrid linear approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it