MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394730427 · doi:10.13031/ja.15718

Measurements and Simulation  of Compressive Behavior of  Biodegradable Seedling Containers

2024· article· en· W4394730427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the ASABE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterials Engineering and Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeedlingCompressive strengthMaterials scienceForensic engineeringComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringHorticultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights Compression tests were conducted on biodegradable containers with various conditions. The lateral loading reduced the compressive strength compared with the vertical loading. A model was developed using FEA to simulate the compressive behavior of the biocontainer. Model results showed similar ductile behaviors of the biocontainers with test results. The compressive strengths of wet biocontainers were below 20% of dry ones. Abstract. Biodegradable seedling containers (biocontainers) are becoming increasingly popular for use in transplanting and greenhouse applications. However, biocontainers have reduced mechanical strength when compared to plastic containers, often being damaged during the handling process. In this study, Canadian peat moss biocontainers were tested to study their compressive properties under different scenarios of various container sizes (small and large), moisture conditions (dry and wet), and orientation (vertical and lateral) relative to the loading direction. Also, simulations were performed using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for the selected scenario, focusing on the small container with two moisture conditions. The testing results showed that the force-displacement behavior of biocontainers varied dramatically with the orientation. In the lateral orientation, the biocontainers were able to carry loads while being largely deformed. However, the lateral orientation resulted in a reduced compressive strength of 21% compared with the vertical orientation. The moisture condition was found to be the second most dominant factor affecting the result. The compressive strength of the wet biocontainer was only 15.4%-19.6% of the dry ones. FEA simulation results showed similar ductile behaviors of the biocontainers under compression. Compared with the testing results, the relative errors of the simulated compressive strengths were 24.0% for the small, dry container and 9.89% for the small, wet one. FEA simulations were conducted with various Young’s Modulus values, revealing a logarithmic relationship with the container strength and deformation. The obtained knowledge of how the biocontainers react when subjected to compression provides insight to the failure mechanism of the container. The information is valuable for guiding the proper handling of biocontainers. Keywords: Biocontainer, Compression, FEA, Moisture condition, Property.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it