Optimal sizing of multi-energy microgrid with electric vehicle integration: Considering carbon emission and resilience load
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To address the intermittency of renewable energy sources, global warming, and increasing load demands, this paper proposes the optimal sizing of a multi-energy microgrid (MEMG) consisting of electrical, thermal, cooling, and hydrogen networks. The system integrates multi-energy storage and EVs along with the resilience load to facilitate a robust operation scheme. The paper introduces an improved resilience backup mechanism for EVs using hybrid storage. Then, random samples for stochastic parameters are generated with Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). To this end, a mixed-integer linear programming-based model is developed to minimize cost, emissions, and load shed. Then, a CPLEX solver is applied to solve it efficiently. The optimal MEMG with the hydrogen network reduces cost by 4% and emissions by 40%. The case study validates that hybrid storage (BES-HST-TST) can effectively reduce the electricity grid purchase to zero, making MEMG self-sufficient while yielding the least annual system cost (ASC) of 3855562$ and decreasing emissions to 8385 kg, resulting in economic savings, environmental sustainability, and increased utilization of renewables. Notably, V2G can save 0.7546% of MEMG extra cost incurred due to EVs integration and significantly reduces CO2 emissions by 4%. A novel finding is that the proposed hybrid storage backup mechanism can effectively minimize the extra cost of keeping the resilience load by retaining 31.46% of backup in hydrogen form. It mitigates risk associated with power outages while achieving the least ASC of 3858933$ and CO2 emissions of 8043 kg. These results can help realize a green, cost-effective, and efficient energy system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".