MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394734236 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.103813

Hierarchical local global transformer for point clouds analysis

2024· article· en· W4394734236 on OpenAlexaff
Dilong Li, Shenghong Zheng, Ziyi Chen, Xiang Li, Lanying Wang, Ji‐Xiang Du

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCartographyPoint cloudComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A novel local global Transformer module is proposed to learn the inner-group self-attention and cross-group self attention. • A novel geometric moment based position encoding module is proposed to embed comprehensive local geometric relationship. • A global feature pooling module is proposed to obtain the global features with accuracy attention weights. Transformer networks have demonstrated remarkable performance in point cloud analysis. However, achieving a balance between local regional context and global long-range context learning remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we propose a Hierarchical Local Global Transformer Network (LGTNet), designed to capture local and global contexts in a hierarchical manner. Specifically, we employ serial local and global Transformers to learn the inner-group and cross-group self-attention, respectively. Besides, we propose a geometric moment-based position encoding for local Transformer, enabling the embedding of comprehensive local geometric relationship. Additionally, we also introduce a global feature pooling module that extracts the global features from each encoder layers. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that LGTNet achieves state-of-the-art performance on ShapeNetPart and ScanObjectNN datasets. This approach effectively enhances the understanding of point cloud scenes, thereby facilitating the use of point cloud data in remote sensing applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207