MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394742259 · doi:10.1080/13647830.2024.2337641

Flame-acoustic interactions in high-pressure H <sub>2</sub> /air diffusion flames

2024· article· en· W4394742259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Theory and Modelling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAmbient pressureMechanicsPressure gradientDiffusionSpectral densitySound pressureCompressibilityBar (unit)ChemistryAcousticsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding flame-acoustics interaction (FAI) that can potentially trigger thermoacoustic instabilities is of critical importance to mitigate the serious side effects of pressure oscillations. While FAI has been studied extensively in premixed flames, comparatively less analysis has been conducted to explore FAI mechanisms in non-premixed flames, especially under high-pressure conditions. This study aims to numerically investigate FAI in high-pressure hydrogen/air counterflow diffusion flames, with special attention on the impact of pressure on FAI. To this end, a fully compressible unsteady counterflow solver combined with Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions (NSCBC) is employed to capture the reflection of the acoustic waves at the boundaries. The results show that for all ambient pressures (1≤Pa≤60 bar) considered here, real-gas effects on flame structures are negligible and that increasing Pa would lead to a power-law dependence of density gradient on Pa with an exponent of 1.5. Furthermore, all tested cases show acoustic growth with time under fully reflecting boundary conditions, which is found to be pressure dependent. The flames become less resilient to FAI when the pressure (or density gradient) is increased. The results from the spectral analysis show that for all ambient pressures, there is only a single dominant frequency at the low-density fuel side and two dominant frequencies at the high-density oxidiser side. This indicates that the pressure oscillation is more sinusoidal at the H2 side than that at the air side. Moreover, the phase space portraits of pressure signals indicate that the dynamics of the system are becoming periodic and approaching a limit cycle. It is found that the integrated heat release rate and the pressure fluctuations are partially in phase, which is responsible for the growth of high-frequency acoustic waves at both fuel and oxidiser sides. On the other hand, the significant density gradient contributes to the growth of low-frequency acoustic waves at the oxidiser side due to the high degree of acoustic reflectivity at the density boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it