MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394744164 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2024.3384936

A Low-Power High-BW PAM4 VCSEL Driver With Three-Tap FFE in 12-nm CMOS FinFET Process

2024· article· en· W4394744164 on OpenAlexafffund
Milad Haghi Kashani, Hossein Shakiba, Ali Sheikholeslami

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei Technologies
KeywordsCMOSVertical-cavity surface-emitting laserProcess (computing)OptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsEngineeringLaserOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a low-power high-bandwidth (BW) PAM4 VCSEL transmitter. We introduce a new cascode voltage-mode (VM) driver to provide a larger output modulation current while using smaller devices and lower power consumption compared to the conventional VM driver. This improves the power efficiency and relaxes the self-loading concern in the conventional designs. The driver also includes an asymmetric three-tap feedforward equalizer (FFE) for MSB and LSB to effectively compensate for the BW and nonlinearity response of the VCSEL. Further, the driver is implemented using multiple segments to optimize the output impedance and linearity. The proposed transmitter is implemented in a 12-nm CMOS FinFET process and is packaged to facilitate both electrical and optical measurements. Based on the electrical measurement, the transmitter supports up to 50-Gb/s nonreturn to zero (NRZ) and up to 64-Gb/s PAM4 data transmission. The optical measurement is done using a commercial 850-nm anode-driven VCSEL. Based on the optical measurement, the proposed design supports up to 40-Gb/s NRZ and 50-Gb/s PAM4 data transmission with an optical modulation amplitude (OMA) of better than 1.4 dBm and power efficiency of 0.82 (excluding VCSEL power) and 0.97 pJ/b using three supplies of 1, 2, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-$</tex-math> </inline-formula> 1.5 V providing currents of 11, 15, and 5 mA, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207