MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394745412 · doi:10.62913/engj.v41i1.821

Elastic In-Plane Stiffness for a Circular Cut Reduced Beam Section (RBS)

2004· article· en· W4394745412 on OpenAlexaff
Nestor R. Iwankiw, Jamshid Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessSection (typography)Beam (structure)Structural engineeringPlane (geometry)Moment (physics)Connection (principal bundle)Representation (politics)EngineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceGeometryMathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One newer moment connection that has been introduced and validated (prequalified) for use in high seismic areas is the so-called "dogbone"ť, or reduced beam section (RBS). The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the basic in-plane stiffness formulation for a prismatic beam, develop more rigorously the full non-prismatic, first-order elastic stiffness changes caused by the circular RBS, provide its simplified representation, and finally conclude with the general RBS stiffness effect suggestions for design. Other RBS seismic design and performance issues of this efficient and popular detail will not be addressed, as they are already well covered in other available sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering JournalSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207