MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394745412 · doi:10.62913/engj.v41i1.821

Elastic In-Plane Stiffness for a Circular Cut Reduced Beam Section (RBS)

2004· article· en· W4394745412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessSection (typography)Beam (structure)Structural engineeringPlane (geometry)Moment (physics)Connection (principal bundle)Representation (politics)EngineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceGeometryMathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One newer moment connection that has been introduced and validated (prequalified) for use in high seismic areas is the so-called "dogbone"ť, or reduced beam section (RBS). The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the basic in-plane stiffness formulation for a prismatic beam, develop more rigorously the full non-prismatic, first-order elastic stiffness changes caused by the circular RBS, provide its simplified representation, and finally conclude with the general RBS stiffness effect suggestions for design. Other RBS seismic design and performance issues of this efficient and popular detail will not be addressed, as they are already well covered in other available sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it