MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394747031 · doi:10.62913/engj.v51i4.1071

Effective Weld Properties for Hollow Structural Section T-Connections under Branch In-Plane Bending

2014· article· en· W4394747031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsWeldingStructural engineeringFillet weldBendingBending momentSection (typography)Joint (building)Transverse planeHigh strength steelMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2010 AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings has expanded the scope in Chapter K, "Design of HSS and Box Member Connections,"� to include a Section K4, "Welds of Plates and Branches to Rectangular HSS."� An experimental program was undertaken to test various unreinforced HSS-to-HSS 90° T-connections subject to branch in-plane bending moment with the objective of determining the effectiveness of the welded joint. Twelve unique test specimens were designed to be weld-critical, and the results from the full-scale tests revealed that the current equation for the effective elastic section modulus for in-plane bending, Sip, given in Table K4.1 of AISC 360-10, is very conservative. A modification to the current requirement that limits the effective width of the transverse weld elements is proposed, resulting in a safe but more economical weld design method for HSS-to-HSS T-connections subject to branch bending moment. By reanalyzing the data of prior weld-critical tests on HSS-to-HSS T- and X- (cross-) connections subject to branch axial loading, it is shown that the proposed new weld effective length recommendation is applicable to these connections as well. It is also concluded that the fillet weld directional strength enhancement factor, (1.00 + 0.50sin1.5θ), should not be used for strength calculations of welded joints to square and rectangular HSS, with the proposed revision, when the effective length method is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it