Engineering topological interface states in metal‐wire waveguides for broadband terahertz signal processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Innovative terahertz waveguides are in high demand to serve as a versatile platform for transporting and manipulating terahertz signals for the full deployment of future six-generation (6G) communication systems. Metal-wire waveguides have emerged as promising candidates, offering the crucial advantage of sustaining low-loss and low-dispersion propagation of broadband terahertz pulses. Recent advances have opened up new avenues for implementing signal-processing functionalities within metal-wire waveguides by directly engraving grooves along the wire surfaces. However, the challenge remains to design novel groove structures to unlock unprecedented signal-processing functionalities. In this study, we report a plasmonic signal processor by engineering topological interface states within a terahertz two-wire waveguide. We construct the interface by connecting two multiscale groove structures with distinct topological invariants, i.e., featuring a π-shift difference in the Zak phases. The existence of this topological interface within the waveguide is experimentally validated by investigating the transmission spectrum, revealing a prominent transmission peak in the center of the topological bandgap. Remarkably, we show that this resonance is highly robust against structural disorders, and its quality factor can be flexibly controlled. This unique feature not only facilitates essential functions such as band filtering and isolating but also promises to serve as a linear differential equation solver. Our approach paves the way for the development of new-generation all-optical analog signal processors tailored for future terahertz networks, featuring remarkable structural simplicity, ultrafast processing speeds, as well as highly reliable performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".