MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394760735 · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2024.0042

Post-Cambrian survival of the tubicolous scalidophoran <i>Selkirkia</i>

2024· article· en· W4394760735 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karma Nanglu, Javier Ortega‐Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de LausanneNorthwest UniversityUniversity of TorontoNational Science FoundationYale UniversityUniversiteit Gent
KeywordsBiologyEvolutionary biologyEcologyPaleontologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scalidophoran worms represent common infaunal components of early and middle Cambrian Burgess Shale-type fossil biotas. Early scalidophorans resemble extant priapulids based on overall morphology, but the genus Selkirkia represents the earliest record of tube dwelling for the group. Despite its ubiquitous presence in exceptional marine deposits, whether the exclusively Cambrian occurrence of Selkirkia reflects its entire evolutionary history or is affected by taphonomic biases remains unresolved. Here, we demonstrate the post-Cambrian survival of Selkirkia based on new material from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale biota of Morocco. The discovery of Selkirkia in the Fezouata Shale extends the biostratigraphic range of the genus by 25 million years and its palaeobiogeographic occurrence to the high latitudes of Gondwana, strengthens the evolutionary links between Cambrian and Ordovician Burgess Shale-type biotas and increases scalidophoran diversity for the Fezouata Shale biota otherwise consisting exclusively of the palaeoscolecid Palaeoscolex? tenensis . The tube of Selkirkia underwent negligible external change for over 40 million years, indicating a high degree of morphological stasis during the Early Palaeozoic. A tubicolous mode of life is rare among extant priapulids and expressed only in Maccabeus , which forms a delicate tube from agglutinated plant debris, unlike the macroscopic secreted cuticular tube of Selkirkia .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology LettersSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207