MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

[Association of ITGA4 and ICAM-1 gene polymorphisms with the risk and clinicopathological characteristics of Crohn's disease].

2024· article· en· W4394761947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dingli Zhang, Hao Wu, Xiaoxiao Shao, Huiying Xiao, Yi Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineGastroenterologyGenotypeMedicineCrohn's diseaseICAM-1AlleleBody mass indexOdds ratioLogistic regressionDiseaseImmunologyGeneBiologyCell adhesion moleculeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the polymorphism of integral protein α4 (ITGA4) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) genes and the risk and clinicopathological characteristics of Crohn's disease (CD) among Chinese patients. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2021, a total of 215 CD patients and 529 gender- and age-matched healthy controls were enrolled from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University as the study subjects. Genotypes of ITGA4 (rs6740847, rs7562325) and ICAM-1 (rs5498) were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) was applied to assess the disease activity of CD, and the patients were further divided into subgroups based on the Montreal Classification Criteria of CD. Unconditional logistic regression was employed to analyze the distribution of ITGA4 (rs6740847, rs7562325) and ICAM-1 (rs5498) polymorphisms between the patients and healthy controls and their association with the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: The frequencies of T allele and CT+TT genotypes of ITGA4 (rs7562325) were higher in CD patients than the healthy controls (40.70% vs. 31.57%, P = 0.001; 62.79% vs. 54.36%, P = 0.042). The G variant and AG+GG genotypes of ITGA4 (rs6740847) were less common in patients with moderately to severely active CD compared with those with mildly active CD (31.18% vs. 51.72%, P = 0.002; 55.91% vs. 75.86%, P = 0.042). However, the opposite conclusion was drawn for the G allele (G) and AG+GG genotypes of ICAM-1 (rs5498) (31.45% vs. 17.24%, P = 0.027; 54.30% vs. 31.04%, P = 0.020). Compared with patients with terminal ileal or ileocolic CD, G allele and AG+GG genotypes of ITGA4 (rs6740847) were more prevalent in patients with colonic CD (55.26% vs. 29.38%, P < 0.001; 84.21% vs. 53.11%, P<0.001). The same conclusion could also be drawn for the G allele and AG+GG genotypes of ICAM-1 (rs5498) (42.11% vs. 26.84%, P = 0.008; 73.69% vs. 46.33%, P = 0.002). The frequency of homozygous GG genotype of ICAM-1 (rs5498) was lower in patients with stricturing and penetrating CD than those with non-stricturing and non-penetrating CD (0.00% vs. 12.32%, P = 0.001). The G allele and AG+GG genotypes of the ITGA4 (rs6740847) were more common in patients with perianal lesions than those without (40.28% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.049; 72.22% vs. 51.75%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Variants of the ITGA4 (rs7562325) may be a risk factor for CD, whilst those of the ITGA4 (rs6740847) may be associated with the decline of disease activity and risk for colon involvement and perianal lesions. Variants of the ICAM-1 (rs5498) may increase the risk of disease activity and colonic involvement in CD patients, however, it may be a protective factor for stenosis and penetration. In addition, variants of the ITGA4 (rs6740847) and ICAM-1 (rs5498) may be associated with the early onset of CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→