MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Comprehensive Review on the Boosted Effects of Anion Vacancy in the Photocatalytic Solar Water Splitting: Focus on Sulfur Vacancy

2024· review· en· W4394768451 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdieh Rezaei, Alireza Nezamzadeh‐Ejhieh, Ahmad Reza Massah

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater splittingPhotocatalysisChalcogenideVacancy defectPhotocatalytic water splittingMaterials scienceSulfideBand gapCharge carrierNanotechnologySemiconductorHydrogen productionHydrogenOptoelectronicsChemistryCatalysisMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, a great interest in photocatalytic water splitting has been due to the importance of sunlight water splitting hydrogen production as a renewable energy source to reduce global warming effects. The photocatalytic water splitting applications of metal sulfide semiconductors photocatalysts, as chalcogenide compounds, with advantages of the wide range for light harvesting and tunable bandgap, may be restricted by the limited active sites, poor conductivity, photo corrosion, and charge recombination. The sulfur vacancy (SV) effectively addresses these issues and generates H 2 and O 2 by attaining adequate water-splitting because of the improved optoelectronic features. This review article aims to comprehensively highlight the synergistic roles of SV in metal sulfides for amended overall water-splitting activity. The SV-modulated metal sulfides’ photocatalytic features are deliberated, followed by different advanced synthetic techniques for effectual vacancy defect generation. The specific SV aspects in refining the optical harvesting range, dynamics of charge carrier, and photoinduced surface chemical reactions are deeply described for overall water splitting applications. Finally, summarized vouchsafing outlooks and opportunities confronting the S-vacancy engineered metal sulfides-based photocatalysts are elucidated. It would be expected and hoped that this review will help researchers design/fabricate better metal sulfide-based photocatalytic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207