Abnormal functional connectivity of white-matter networks and gray-white matter functional networks in patients with NMOSD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive impairment (CI) has been reported in 29-70% of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Abnormal white matter (WM) functional networks that correlate with cognitive functions have not been studied well in patients with NMOSD. The aim of the current study was to investigate functional connectivity (FC), spontaneous activity, and functional covariance connectivity (FCC) abnormalities of WM functional networks in patients with NMOSD and their correlation with cognitive performance. Twenty-four patients with NMOSD and 24 healthy controls (HCs) were included in the study. Participants underwent brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Eight WM networks and nine gray matter (GM) networks were created. In patients, WM networks, including WM1-4, WM1-8, WM2-6, WM2-7, WM2-8, WM4-8, WM5-8 showed reduced FC (P < 0.05). All WM networks except WM1 showed decreased spontaneous activity (P < 0.05). The major GM networks demonstrated increased/decreased FC (P < 0.05), whereas GM7-WM7, GM8-WM4, GM8-WM6 and GM8-WM8 displayed decreased FC (P < 0.05). The MoCA results showed that two-thirds (16/24) of the patients had CI. FC and FCC in WM networks were correlated negatively with the MoCA scores (P < 0.05). WM functional networks are multi-layered. Abnormal FC of WM functional networks and GM functional networks may be responsible for CI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".