Noninvasive Monitoring of Tissue Temperature Changes Induced by Focused Ultrasound Exposure using Sparse Expression of Ultrasonic Radio Frequency Echo Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive therapies such as focused ultrasound were developed to be used for cancer therapies, vessel bleeding, and drug delivery. The main purpose of focused ultrasound therapy is to affect regions of interest (ROI) of tissues without any injuries to surrounding tissues. In this regard, an appropriate monitoring method is required to control the treatment. Methods: This study is aimed to develop a noninvasive monitoring technique of focused ultrasound (US) treatment using sparse representation of US radio frequency (RF) echo signals. To this end, reasonable results in temperature change estimation in the tissue under focused US radiation were obtained by utilizing algorithms related to sparse optimization as orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) and accompanying Shannon's entropy. Consequently, ex vivo tissue experimental tests yielded two datasets, including low-intensity focused US (LIFU) and high-intensity focused US (HIFU) data. The proposed processing method analyzed the ultrasonic RF echo signal and expressed it as a sparse signal and calculated the entropy of each frame. Results: The results indicated that the suggested approach could noninvasively estimate temperature changes between 37°C and 47°C during LIFU therapy. In addition, it represented temperature changes during HIFU ablation at various powers, ranging from 10 to 130 W. The normalized mean square error of the proposed method is 0.28, approximately 2.15 on previous related methods. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that this novel proposed approach, including the combination of sparsity and Shanoon's entropy, is more feasible and effective in temperature change estimation than its predecessors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".