MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394773591 · doi:10.1109/trs.2024.3387950

A Modified Kirchhoff Migration for Microwave Imaging in Superluminal Propagation Region

2024· article· en· W4394773591 on OpenAlexafffund
Fatemeh Modares Sabzevari, Robert Winter, Karumudi Rambabu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Radar Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsRealNetworks (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntenna (radio)MicrowaveSeismic migrationPhysicsSuperluminal motionOpticsAcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave imaging has been developed recently and is used in many applications. Kirchhoff’s migration technique is one of the most popular methods to recover the geometric info of any inaccessible target from raw data. The conventional Kirchhoff’s migration assumes a uniform propagation velocity in the far-field region of the transceiver, i.e., the antenna. In the near-field region of the antenna, the pulse propagation happens at a significantly greater speed compared to the far-field region. The propagation speed of the pulse depends on the antenna dimensions and varies as a function of the distance and angle of the antenna in a non-linear manner. This non-linearity causes non-focused images. In this work, a modified Kirchhoff’s migration method is proposed to take into account the non-uniformity of the propagation speed. Then, the proposed method is verified through several simulations and experiments and it is shown that the modified Kirchhoff’s migration results in focused images in the near-field region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Radar SystemsSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207