Francisco Ramírez Vas: Press and medical philosophy in the third quarter of the 19<sup>th</sup> century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through present work we try to rescue of the forgetfulness to one of the habitual companies in presses medical Spanish to him of the third quarter of century XIX. Versatile doctor, of philanthropics ideas, pioneer of the frontier, hygienist medical convinced, and reputed collaborating of diverse national publications. It laid the foundations its prestige in a modern conception of the medicine, in the clarity to the hour to expose its principles and in the application of such in its daily work. Good it divides its philosophy medical was reflected in the medical press and the correspondence that maintained with the professionals who in her wrote.<br><br>Pretendemos rescatar del olvido a una de las firmas habituales en la prensa médica española del tercer cuarto del siglo XIX. Médico polifacético, de ideas filantrópicas, pionero del periodismo médico extremeño, higienista convencido, y reputado colaborador de diversas publicaciones nacionales. Cimentó su prestigio en una concepción moderna de la medicina, en la claridad a la hora de exponer sus principios y en la aplicación de los mismos en su trabajo diario. Buena parte de su filosofía médica quedó reflejada en la prensa médica y en la correspondencia que mantuvo con los profesionales que en ella escribían.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it