MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394783406 · doi:10.1002/jhm.13367

Things We Do for No Reason™: Discharge before noon

2024· article· en· W4394783406 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron Dunn, Elise Peterson Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNoonIntensive care medicineAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hospital has recently implemented a goal of 30% of discharges before noon to address overcrowding and boarding in the emergency department (ED).To accommodate this, resident didactics were cut to 30 min and the hospital medicine team starts rounding at 8:30 a.m.On rounds, teams are encouraged to prioritize patients who are possible discharges to meet the administrative goal.The medical student, who is covering two of the more complex patients who are not ready for discharge and about whom she has several questions, worries that this change in priorities will negatively impact her patients by delaying their evaluation.She asks about this change in rounding structure and how inpatient discharges affect the ED.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0040.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital MedicineSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207